How to Draft an Excellent AI Skill or Prompt

· · 3 min read
View as Markdown Open in ChatGPT Open in Claude

How to Draft an Excellent AI Skill or Prompt

The best prompts are not written — they are distilled. This is the process for building a world-class system prompt or AI skill from first principles.


The Method: Expert Distillation

Step 1 — Identify the Top Experts

Ask: “Who are the top 10–20 people in history who are considered the best at [the skill this AI needs to perform]?”

Cast wide. Include:

  • Historical masters (deceased counts)
  • Living practitioners at the apex of the field
  • Adjacent thinkers whose frameworks transferred into the domain
  • People known for taste and judgment, not just output

The goal is to build a reference canon — not a list of names to drop, but a set of minds whose accumulated judgment will inform the system’s defaults.


Step 2 — Extract Their Best Thinking

For each expert on the list, ask: “What are the most important quotes, rules, views, and thoughts this person ever expressed about the craft?”

Capture:

  • Their strongest one-liners and principles
  • The distinctions they made that others missed
  • The things they warned against
  • The standards they held themselves and others to
  • Their mental models and heuristics

Do this for every name on the list. Let the outputs accumulate without editing yet.


Step 3 — Extract Principles, Methodologies, and Frameworks

Ask: “What key principles, methodologies, or frameworks did these people develop or live by?”

Look for:

  • Recurring themes across multiple experts (signal)
  • Sharp disagreements between them (tension = important tradeoff)
  • Frameworks that survived decades or cross-domain application
  • Process steps that the best practitioners share regardless of style

This is where the raw quotes become structured knowledge.


Step 4 — Distill Into a Peer Briefing

The final step is compression. Ask:

“If one of these experts had to brief a peer — someone already skilled, walking into the room — in the most token-efficient format possible, what would they say? No padding. No explanation of basics. Just the rules that matter.”

This output is your prompt.

The briefing format forces:

  • Elimination of anything obvious or derivable
  • Maximum signal density
  • Confident defaults (not hedged suggestions)
  • The voice of mastery, not instruction

Why It Works

Most prompts tell the AI what to do. This method tells the AI how to think — by loading it with the accumulated judgment of the best people who ever thought about that problem.

The result is a system that:

  • Has taste, not just rules
  • Has defaults that reflect excellence, not mediocrity
  • Knows what to avoid without being told in the moment
  • Can make judgment calls the way a skilled practitioner would

Reference Example

The First Team Logo Designer prompt was built exactly this way:

  1. Asked for the top logo and brand identity designers in history (Rand, Bass, Vignelli, Chermayeff, Geismar, Haviv, Fletcher, Aicher, Lubalin, Wyman, Müller-Brockmann, Crouwel, and others)
  2. Extracted their strongest quotes, standards, and distinctions about what makes a great logo
  3. Extracted their process logic, reduction principles, and system-building frameworks
  4. Compressed it all into a peer-level briefing — what a master designer would say to another designer walking in the door

The final prompt doesn’t explain what a logo is. It tells the AI to think like Paul Rand, move like Sagi Haviv, and build systems like Vignelli — and it benchmarks every output against that panel.

That is the bar.


The Compact Rule Set for This Method

  • Experts first, content second
  • Extract quotes before principles — quotes preserve tone
  • Principles before process — frameworks outlast steps
  • Compress last — distillation is the final move, not the first
  • Write for a peer, not a beginner — the AI already knows the basics
  • Defaults over instructions — encode what to do by default, not just what to avoid
  • One strong voice — the final prompt should sound like a single expert, not a committee
  • Benchmark explicitly — name the standard the output will be held to